Tintern Abbey
|
ENGLAND’S ROYAL MONSTER PART II
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS – SACRILEGIOUS PLUNDER
KING HENRY VIII now bestrode his realm like a colossus – albeit a
somewhat uncomfortable colossus : physically the serious injury caused to
his leg in a jousting contest in 1535 was troubling him as it would do
for the remaining years of his life. Financially, his Treasury was
strapped for cash. Years of foreign wars and the King’s personal
gambling brought him to a desperate condition.
Henry now had as his principal agent and adviser, one Thomas Crumwell (now usually spelled Cromwell – a piece of Protestant propagandising). This Crumwell had been Cardinal Wolsey’s principal agent and frequent Commissioner. But when Wolsey’s downfall was in progress, Crumwell stole from Wolsey’s private records Henry’s license under Seal, authorizing Wolsey to exercise his Legatine
powers within the Realm. He delivered the document back to the King.
This was a critical event for Henry’s purposes, for he was charging
Wolsey with Praemunire offences for the very act of exercising his Papal Legate A Latere (Abroad) powers in the Realm!
The King’s gratitude seems to have hardly known any bounds. For Crumwell
became (in a unique Royal office) “Vicar General of the Realm”, Lord
Privy Seal, Chancellor of Cambridge University (succeeding St John
Fisher so lately martyred by the King!) and, though not a Cleric, Dean
of Wells along with other religious benefices and, in Parliament, he
took precedence over all of the Nobility and the Bishops!
Crumwell
had been Cardinal Wolsey’s Commissioner in the examination of the
lesser Monasteries, in an endeavour to assess their viability. Many were
not believed to fulfill their religious obligations, have too few monks to function
properly and to fulfill those obligations. Cardinal Wolsey, using his Legatine
powers, had canonically suppressed those monasteries and negotiated the
re-location of their monks to larger monasteries of their Orders. The
properties were sold and the proceeds used to build Cardinal College
Oxford.
Crumwell’s past therefore enabled him to suggest a solution to the
King’s financial distress. Now that the King was, according to his
Parliament, Head of the Church in England, and able to threaten all and
sundry with trial under the Law of Praemunire
should they displease him, he had legal power over the monasteries. If
he came to “believe “that the monasteries were corrupt, why should he
not suppress them? No! that was a canonical term; why not rather,
dissolve them! The proceeds of their dissolution would be made forfeit
to the Crown- financial problem solved!
In the 27th year of his reign, in 1536, the Dissolution of the Monasteries was commenced.
All monasteries whose annual income did not reach 200 Pounds were
dissolved and were confiscated by the Crown. They were STOLEN there is
no other term to describe the process honestly. The process involved
sending out the King’s Commissioners who assessed the Monasteries’
incomes and took an inventory including property, Sacred Vessels,
Shrines and cash. The inventory would be useful for later stages of the
Dissolution process.
The Commissioners were carefully chosen by Crumwell to produce the desired results, and knew what was expected of them. They were mostly Protestant sympathizers and, to meet the complaints at the dissolution of each Monastery from the community it supported they created tales of scandals and disrepute which varied from ridiculous palpable lies to malign distortions of innocent facts.
It is appropriate here to consider the role of the Monasteries in England at
the time. Their practical significance for their surrounding communities
was very substantial. Most monasteries were by that time, very old and
owned significant lands in their region, as a result of bequests,
donations and their earnings from rents on their holdings. The monks of
course received no personal income and the monasteries were thus very
effective in building up their assets. They were, apart from the
properties of the Nobility, the principal factor in the local economy,
much of which depended on them and the local community relied heavily on
the monasteries. At that time, there were no “Social Services” provided
by the Crown and no secular welfare services. The monasteries provided
food and lodgings for the poor, the distressed and the unsupported aged
and the ill.
Even local Parish clergy depended on the monasteries. Before the
Protestant Deformation of the Church, outside the Cities, the local
Parish clergy were appointed as “Vicars” of the local Abbot. The Church
of England still uses the term “Vicar” to describe its Parish ministers,
but the origin of the term can be seen to be Catholic – from the time
of the stolen monasteries.
It can be quickly seen that demolition of this social structure was going to create turmoil and great strife and would take dramatic justification if it was to be accomplished without revolution. Lies about scandal, and the bigger the lie the better, would do nicely.
The Commissioners were entitled to their cut first- often a fee plus "
costs”, but it can be shown that it was commonly exceptional. They then
returned the rest of the proceeds to the Royal Treasury via Crumwell
who often reserved items for himself (e.g. in one case a particularly
valuable Monstrance he had earlier spotted and noted for his own booty.)
Our knowledge of the sordid detail is great, in part because, when Crumwell himself fell, he fell far and fast- so fast he did not have time to destroy his papers, even his meticulous personal notes, which are preserved.
We are told that “practice makes perfect”. These institutions were devoured within two years. But the Monster had acquired an enormous appetite and was still ravenous.
In the 34th year of his reign Henry turned on all the Colleges, Chapels,
Chantries, Hospitals, Fraternities and Guilds and their properties and
assets were all confiscated to the Crown.
By the time the exercise was completed, the Royal Monster had devoured:
110Religious Hospitals
374 Lesser Monasteries
186 Great Monasteries and Abbeys
90 Colleges
110Religious Hospitals
2,374 Chapels and Chantries.
THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF CATHOLIC ENGLAND’S LIFE BUILT UP OVER THE
PRECEDING 1,300 YEARS HAD BEEN STOLEN AND CONVERTED TO CASH WITHIN 10
YEARS. THE VALUE OF THE THEFT WAS METICULOUSLY ASSESSED BY THE KING’S
COMMISSIONERS AT 1,338,442 Pounds 9 Shillings and 2Pence and 1 Ha’penny.
in the currency of the day.
Whitby Abbey |
Four hundred and sixty three years have
passed since that infamous accounting. Who would attempt a conversion to
modern currency allowing for inflation? Certainly it would be a
dreadful task. But if the result was not billions of dollars, one would
be surprised.
This extraordinary amount did not include the value of Sacred Vessels, Shrines, Votive Offerings and Reliquaries. Some idea of what that entailed may be gleaned from an account of the goods stolen from the greatest of the Shrines, that of St. Thomas A’Beckett at Canterbury Cathedral. The King’s Receiver records removing 26 carts of gold, silver, precious stones and sacred vestments. In the Treasurer’s Roll, the plunder was assessed by weight:
Thomas Crumwell |
Pure Gold 5,030 ¾ ounces
Silver Gilt 4,425 ounces
Parcel Gilt 840 ounces
(this is gilding inside a vessel)
Silver 5,286 ounces
Fortunately for the Archdioceses and Dioceses and their great
Cathedrals, Henry died in 1547. For in the preceding year his attention
had turned ominously to them and he had forced the “exchange “of 72
properties belonging to the Archdiocese of York for certain infertile
Crown Lands and 30 properties belonging to the Diocese of Norwich and
considerable properties belonging to the Diocese of London on the same
basis.
In our next installment, we shall look at what became of the funds
realised from the stolen properties and, in God’s good time, what became
of the receivers of the stolen property. It is a sorry story.
No comments:
Post a Comment